By · · last updated 2026-07-25

What Crypto Exchanges Teach Us About OFAC Settlements

Kraken paid $362,158, Bittrex $24.3M, Poloniex $7.6M. The documented OFAC settlements with crypto exchanges — and the screening gaps they share.

ShareX / TwitterLinkedInRedditHN

OFAC's enforcement record with crypto exchanges is the best public dataset on what screening gaps cost. Three settlements tell the story.

The record

Kraken (2022): $362,158 for apparent violations involving users in embargoed jurisdictions — sanctions evasion through unblocked accounts.
Bittrex (2022): $24.3M for processing transactions involving sanctioned jurisdictions without screening.
Poloniex (2023): $7.6M for similar jurisdiction screening failures.

The common thread

📋 Free: Agent Compliance Checklist (PDF)

A 1-page compliance audit for your payment agent. Check your setup against the 7-point framework. Enter your email — we send it instantly.

Each settlement traces to the same gap: counterparty and jurisdiction screening that did not run before transactions settled. The amounts scale with volume — which is exactly why agents, executing hundreds of payments autonomously, are the highest-risk surface.

The lesson for agents

Exchanges paid millions to learn what a pre-transaction screen costs nothing to run. The pattern is the same: screen before sign, log every result, fail closed. The enforcement dataset tracks the record.

ShareX / TwitterLinkedInRedditHN

Screen your agents payments

Free tier, 5 checks/day. Add compliance before money moves.

Try the free checker  See pricing