By ยท ยท last updated 2026-07-30

Risk Scoring for Agent Payments: The Three Signals

Sanctions screening answers 'is this prohibited?' Risk scoring answers 'how risky is this?' The three signals that matter for agent payments.

ShareX / TwitterLinkedInRedditHN

Screening is binary: clean or match. Risk scoring is continuous: allow, review, or decline. For agent payments, three signals carry most of the information.

Signal 1: Amount

Anomaly detection against the counterparty's history and category baselines. A first-time $50,000 payment from a $5 agent reads differently than a routine micro-payment.

Signal 2: Rail

๐Ÿ“‹ Free: Agent Compliance Checklist (PDF)

A 1-page compliance audit for your payment agent. Check your setup against the 7-point framework. Enter your email โ€” we send it instantly.

Some rails carry more exposure than others: irreversible transfers, high-latency settlement, cross-border paths. The rail is part of the risk, not just the plumbing.

Signal 3: Category

Counterparty category and jurisdiction exposure. A payment into a high-risk category or embargoed-adjacent geography scores higher regardless of the address.

The combination

risk_score combines the three into allow/review/decline with a numeric score โ€” the layer above the sanctions gate. Screen first (binary), score second (continuous), then sign.

ShareX / TwitterLinkedInRedditHN

Screen your agents payments

Free tier, 5 checks/day. Add compliance before money moves.

Try the free checker  See pricing