By ยท ยท last updated 2026-08-03

Self-Hosting Sanctions Screening: When It Makes Sense

The MIT-licensed self-host option explained: when self-hosting screening is right, what it costs, and the list-freshness burden you take on.

ShareX / TwitterLinkedInRedditHN

Sanctions screening can run in your own infrastructure โ€” the core is MIT-licensed. Self-hosting is right for some teams and a trap for others.

When self-hosting makes sense

You need data residency or air-gapped operation. You already run compliance infrastructure. You want full control of the list pipeline and logs.

The cost nobody quotes

๐Ÿ“‹ Free: Agent Compliance Checklist (PDF)

A 1-page compliance audit for your payment agent. Check your setup against the 7-point framework. Enter your email โ€” we send it instantly.

The engine is free; the burden is the data: mirroring the SDN list, syncing hourly, handling designations between releases, and failing closed on sync failure. A stale self-hosted list is a compliance gap with your own name on it.

The honest comparison

Hosted: $19/mo, zero list maintenance, sub-100 ms, hourly sync handled. Self-hosted: free software, your team owns freshness and uptime. The self-host FAQ covers the details.

The decision

Start hosted to validate; self-host when the requirements demand it โ€” and budget for the data pipeline either way.

ShareX / TwitterLinkedInRedditHN

Screen your agents payments

Free tier, 5 checks/day. Add compliance before money moves.

Try the free checker  See pricing